Decoding What Makes Elite Teams Exceptional

This email is brought to you by Wickit.

​

I've been using Wickit for several months now - and I love what it does for my clothes. I'm finding that my workout gear (which is basically all I wear now anyway) washes better and lasts longer.

​You can check this video to see what other people are saying, too.​

​The folks over at Wickit were nice enough to give me a coupon code to pass on to you. You'll get 15% off if you sign up here.​

---

Great teams are more than the sum of their talented individuals.

Team performance is not about individual brilliance but about creating the conditions where collective intelligence thrives. To win consistently, you need to create conditions that facilitate it.

The most successful teams share a distinct set of processes that enable them to consistently perform at levels greater than the sum of their parts. We’ll unpack 3 today.

---

Research consistently shows that team effectiveness is rarely accidental. When Google conducted its extensive Project Aristotle research, they expected to find that the best teams were simply collections of the most talented individuals. What they discovered instead was surprising… more on that in a minute, though.

The same finding bears out in sports. In a line of research called the “Too Much Talent Effect,” studies show that there’s a point of diminishing marginal returns on talent - because teamwork suffers.

This finding perfectly aligns with what I've observed working with professional athletes and executives over the past decade. The teams that excel under pressure share specific markers that can be cultivated intentionally.

Here are a few of those key markers.

Psychological Safety - The Foundation of Team Excellence

Psychological safety creates an environment where team members feel safe to take risks, speak their minds, and be vulnerable without fear of punishment or humiliation.

This was the process Google uncovered in Project Aristotle. The best teams didn’t have the best talent, they had the most openness and honesty. It wasn’t about being right, but getting it right.

Psychological safety gives your team freedom to pursue expressing their full potential.

The Liverpool team that won their first Premier League title in 30 years demonstrated psychological safety beautifully.

Manager Jürgen Klopp created an environment where players at all levels felt empowered to voice opinions. During their championship run, younger players like Trent Alexander-Arnold and Joe Gomez regularly contributed tactical suggestions alongside veterans. This collaborative atmosphere allowed the team to adapt their famous pressing system mid-game, particularly evident in their comeback victories against Barcelona in the Champions League and several late-winning Premier League matches.

Harvard researcher Amy Edmondson found that teams with high psychological safety learn more effectively, make fewer mistakes, and innovate more readily than their counterparts—even when controlling for individual talent levels.

To build psychological safety in your own team, start with three tactical moves:

1. Frame work as learning problems rather than execution problems, acknowledging uncertainty upfront.
2. Normalize vulnerability by responding productively when team members admit mistakes or ask for help.
3. Establish a practice of "curiosity rounds" during meetings where teammates ask genuine questions about each other's ideas before offering critiques.

These small but powerful habits signal that risk-taking and honest dialogue are not just permitted but expected.

Shared Mental Models - Thinking as One

Elite teams develop shared mental frameworks that allow members to anticipate each other's actions, make decisions quickly, and coordinate seamlessly under pressure.

This is the psychology behind a playbook in sports and why they’re so important.

Consider the 2014 San Antonio Spurs, who dismantled the more individually talented Miami Heat with breathtaking ball movement. Players instinctively knew where teammates would move before they moved, creating what coach Gregg Popovich called "the beautiful game." This wasn't just chemistry—it was the result of deliberately cultivated shared mental models.

Studies of military special operations teams show that shared mental models reduce the need for explicit communication by up to 70% in high-pressure situations, allowing for more efficient execution when it matters most.

For leaders looking to develop shared mental models within their teams, consider these tactical approaches:

1. Implement pre-mortems before major projects - Have your team imagine the project has failed, then work backward to identify what could go wrong. This aligns thinking on risks and responses.
2. Create decision trees together - Map out "if-then" scenarios as a team for common challenges, building consensus on response protocols before they're needed.
3. Establish clear decision rights - Define explicitly who makes which decisions under what circumstances, reducing confusion in high-pressure moments.
4. Run regular simulation exercises - Practice potential scenarios in low-stakes environments to build cognitive alignment before facing real challenges.
5. Debrief systematically - After key events, use a consistent framework (like "What happened? Why? What did we learn?") to build shared understanding of experiences.

Productive Conflict - The Growth Catalyst

High-performing teams don't avoid disagreement—they harness it productively, distinguishing between relationship conflict (personal tension) and task conflict (disagreement about ideas).

The New England Patriots dynasty under Bill Belichick mastered productive conflict. During film sessions, players and coaches engaged in direct, sometimes uncomfortable critiques of performance without making it personal. As Tom Brady once explained, "Coach Belichick created an environment where you could say exactly what you thought without worrying about hurt feelings."

Research by organizational psychologist Patrick Lencioni reveals that teams that engage in productive conflict around ideas make better decisions and execute more effectively than those who prioritize artificial harmony.

For leaders looking to foster productive conflict in their teams, consider these tactical approaches:

1. Establish conflict protocols - Create clear guidelines for how disagreements should be voiced, ensuring debates center on ideas rather than personalities.
2. Mine for dissent - Actively seek out opposing viewpoints by asking, "What perspectives are we missing?" or "Who has a different take on this?"
3. Implement "red team" exercises - Designate team members to play devil's advocate during important decisions, legitimizing constructive criticism.
4. Teach conflict resolution skills - Provide training on how to disagree respectfully and how to separate ideas from identity.
5. Celebrate instances of productive disagreement - Publicly recognize when team conflicts led to better outcomes, reinforcing the value of healthy debate.

These practices create a culture where challenging ideas becomes a normal, expected part of the team's process rather than something to be avoided.

Putting It All Together: Building Your Team's Processes

The genetic code of exceptional teams isn't fixed at birth—it can be deliberately cultivated. Here are three immediate steps you can take to strengthen your team's execution of these processes:

1. Create safety through vulnerability modeling

Start team meetings by acknowledging your own uncertainties or mistakes. When leaders demonstrate vulnerability first, it creates permission for others to do the same.

2. Develop shared mental models through scenario planning

Regularly engage your team in "what if" exercises that force collective thinking about how to respond to various challenges. This builds cognitive alignment before crises occur.

3. Establish conflict norms explicitly

Define what productive disagreement looks like in your context. Create clear guidelines that distinguish between challenging ideas (encouraged) and challenging character (discouraged).

Remember that teamwork doesn't emerge overnight. Like physical fitness, it requires consistent practice, deliberate attention, and regular maintenance. The teams that seem to perform effortlessly under pressure have typically invested countless hours developing these invisible bonds that hold them together when circumstances try to pull them apart.

A Final Thought

As Roger Federer reflected in his 2024 Dartmouth commencement speech: "The best in the world are not the best because they win every point. It's because they know they'll lose, again and again, and have learned how to deal with it." The same principle applies to teams. The best teams aren't those that never face adversity—they're the ones that have developed the collective resilience to bounce back stronger.

What's one element of teama work you're looking to strengthen in your organization? I'd love to hear about your experiences and challenges in building high-performing teams.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ And, if you’re stuck, send me your questions - I’ll answer them in an upcoming edition of the newsletter.

​